The close-acceleration and IT-controls pass that A&M, FTI, or AlixPartners scope as a multi-week engagement. Run by the admin already in the seat, finished before the meeting.
The close-acceleration and IT-controls pass that A&M, FTI, or AlixPartners scope as a multi-week engagement. Run by the admin already in the seat, finished before the meeting.
Same tenant, same result. Rule- and signature-based, run off your own machine. No language model in the audit path, so every finding is provenance-stamped and reproducible.
The audit costs nothing and writes nothing. The revenue line is the remediation the report makes obvious. Nothing about the audit is gated on that follow-on.
dataset="Group Financials FY26" workspace=Finance (Prod) last successful refresh = 2026-04-29 (19 days stale) broken relationship: Actuals[CostCentre] -> Dim_CC[Code] consumed by 3 board-distributed reports
subscription=prod-core Owner assignments=7 (2 to guest principals) inline secret in ARM template "sql-failover.json": administratorLoginPassword set as a literal string parameter default
role=Global Administrator assignment=permanent (not PIM-eligible) principal=svc-legacy-sync mfa=false last interactive sign-in=2026-05-14 03:11 UTC
flow="Vendor payment approvals" trigger=scheduled, daily runs as=j.farrell@acme account state=disabled (departed) connections still authorised: SharePoint, SQL, Outlook
Ten minutes, deterministic, you keep the report. Nothing below is gated on it, ever.
A guided pass over the findings: the blast-radius map of which dataset, role, and secret touches what, what is load-bearing versus cosmetic, what to fix first. Read-only. Interpretation, not access.
When you want it fixed, we fix it, or hand your team the exact change set. The engagement, scoped to what the report already made obvious. Seeing what is broken stays free; this is the line.